One of the largest logistics brokerage platforms specializing in express delivery services submitted an acquisition offer to acquire a small logistics services company for a value of approximately SAR 50 million. A general assembly of the partners was convened to deliberate the matter. In the eyes of all attendees, it was a profitable deal. However, the partner holding the smallest ownership stake—no more than 2% of the company’s shares—objected to the acquisition decision, causing the transaction to stall. The dispute escalated to the company that had presented the opportunity, which then determined that continuing negotiations with the target company would entail additional time and burden, and therefore withdrew.

Two years later, the same company was sold to the same acquiring party that had initially made the offer, but for a value not exceeding SAR 20 million.

What if the company’s articles of association had provided for the majority to exercise their rights set out in Article 181 of the Companies Law?

Compulsory Sale of Shares in Limited Liability Companies: Protection of Majority Rights or Restriction on Minority Rights?

Pursuant to Article 181 of the new Saudi Companies Law, the founders of a limited liability company may stipulate in the articles of association the right of the majority of partners (holding a specified percentage of the share capital) to compel the minority to sell their shares, subject to certain conditions and procedures.

This article carries both legal and investment dimensions, as it:

  • From the perspective of investors and entrepreneurs: grants flexibility to the majority to make decisive decisions regarding company ownership, thereby facilitating restructuring and acquisition transactions, and limiting obstacles that may hinder the company’s growth due to minority opposition.
  • From the perspective of minority partners: some investors may view this provision as a form of risk, as it grants the majority powers that may affect their investments without their consent.
  • From a legal perspective: the successful application of this article depends on the clarity of the provisions of the articles of association and the establishment of fair criteria for the sale of shares, in a manner that ensures a balance between protecting minority rights and enabling the majority to make strategic decisions without obstruction.

Company formation is not merely a set of electronic steps on a government platform; it requires a legal expert to enhance the robustness and solidity of the incorporation.

Scroll to Top